🔗 Share this article

Jennifer Lawrence has become part of the increasing number of performers who express doubts about the necessity of on-set intimacy professionals, revealing she chose not to use their services while filming her latest project Die My Love.

Examining the Role of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

On-set intimacy professionals emerged following the #MeToo movement to ensure the safety and comfort of actors during scenes involving nudity and intimate moments. However, several well-known actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and other established stars have voiced concerns about their presence, with some claiming they interfere with creative flow.

Jennifer's On-Set Perspective

Speaking during the Las Culturistas podcast, while promoting her latest project where she portrays a woman descending into postpartum disturbance, the actress stated: "We did not have such a professional, or perhaps we did have one but didn't make use of their services... I felt entirely secure with Rob."

She continued: "He is not pervy and deeply devoted to Suki Waterhouse. What we discussed mostly revolved around family life and relationships. There was never uncomfortable moments or doubts about personal boundaries."

"If there was even a hint of discomfort, I would have requested an intimacy coordinator. Numerous male actors take offense if you aren't interested in their attention, and then the retaliation begins. Rob was not like that."

Industry Recognition and Continuing Discussion

Recently, entertainment database IMDb formally acknowledged on-set intimacy professionals as a distinct credit, together with eleven other crew positions including dance direction, catering, and puppet operation. Before this, they were categorized as "additional crew" rather than having their own designation.

Despite this recognition, these professionals still encounter public discussion suggesting they aren't necessarily industry essential, with high-profile actors rejecting their involvement. Lawrence's perspective echoes that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier revealed she refused professional supervision while filming alongside her co-star on The Morning Show.

Aniston's Experience

"He proved to be extremely respectful – I mean each action, every cut, 'Are you OK?" she recalled. "It was additionally carefully planned. That's the advantage of working with talented directors, appropriate music. So, minimal preparation is needed."

Aniston continued, "They offered, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Please, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're experienced professionals – we can handle this. And we had our director on set."

Other Examples and Professional Response

Despite featuring multiple sequences of intimate moments and frequent nudity, Anora – the director's acclaimed film about a sex worker and a wealthy heir – proceeded without an intimacy coordinator.

Mikey Madison stated she and co-star her screen partner "decided it would be preferable to maintain privacy."

"My character is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had studied Sean's films and understood his dedication to realism. I was professionally ready for it. As an performer, I approached it as part of my job."

These statements generated strong reactions from intimacy coordinators, mirroring the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's public statements, who earlier this year shared that working on her forthcoming project her latest film marked her first encounter with the relatively new profession, which she "did not know existed."

Paltrow's Perspective

When asked about personal ease with a particular action alongside co-star Timothée Chalamet, Paltrow responded: "I'm from the generation where you get naked, you assume position, the camera's on."

Paltrow added that she and Chalamet then told the coordinator: "We think we're comfortable. You can step back.' I can't speak to how it is for emerging actors, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, very stifled by that."

Industry Response

After these statements, industry executive Caroline Hollick described them as "irresponsible" and pointed out that the majority of those speaking against intimacy coordinators possess sufficient fame to command their own power and protection on film sets.

"Occasionally an performer shares opinions about whether they value on-set professionals or not," commented the executive. "The actress stated she came of age in a time when industry professionals 'removed clothing and proceeded professionally'. As a established actress in Hollywood performing alongside a actor much younger than her, although likely Chalamet is comfortable, I considered it somewhat concerning statement."

Actor's Viewpoint

Michael Douglas, meanwhile, shared that he feels the main obligation during intimate sequences rests with the male actor, rather than a third party.

"In my experience, you take responsibility as the man to make certain the female co-star is comfortable, you talk through completely," he explained. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to make contact there if that's agreeable'. It's very deliberate but appears like it's happening naturally, which is hopefully what convincing acting appears as."